Refactor test/dune and add a failing test #2
1 changed files with 34 additions and 55 deletions
|
@ -9,8 +9,6 @@ type t =
|
|||
; branch : Git.Reference.t
|
||||
; store : Store.t
|
||||
; mutable committed : Digestif.SHA1.t option
|
||||
; mutable change_and_push_running : bool
|
||||
; condition : unit Lwt_condition.t
|
||||
; mutex : Lwt_mutex.t
|
||||
; mutable head : Store.hash option }
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -104,7 +102,7 @@ let connect ctx endpoint =
|
|||
init_store () >>= fun store ->
|
||||
let store = to_invalid store in
|
||||
let edn, branch = split_url endpoint in
|
||||
let t = { ctx ; edn ; branch ; store ; committed= None; change_and_push_running= false; condition= Lwt_condition.create (); mutex= Lwt_mutex.create (); head= None } in
|
||||
let t = { ctx ; edn ; branch ; store ; committed= None; mutex= Lwt_mutex.create (); head= None } in
|
||||
pull t >>= fun r ->
|
||||
let _r = to_invalid r in
|
||||
Lwt.return t
|
||||
|
@ -372,7 +370,7 @@ let of_octets ctx ~remote data =
|
|||
Result.fold ~ok:Fun.id ~error:(function `Msg msg -> failwith msg) >>= fun store ->
|
||||
analyze store data >>= fun head ->
|
||||
let edn, branch = split_url remote in
|
||||
Lwt.return_ok { ctx ; edn ; branch ; store ; committed= None; change_and_push_running= false; condition= Lwt_condition.create (); mutex= Lwt_mutex.create (); head; })
|
||||
Lwt.return_ok { ctx ; edn ; branch ; store ; committed= None; mutex= Lwt_mutex.create (); head; })
|
||||
(fun _exn ->
|
||||
Lwt.return_error (`Msg "Invalid PACK file"))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -679,55 +677,36 @@ module Make (Pclock : Mirage_clock.PCLOCK) = struct
|
|||
match t.committed with
|
||||
| Some _ -> Lwt.return_error (`Msg "Nested change_and_push")
|
||||
| None ->
|
||||
(* XXX(dinosaure): serialize [change_and_push]. If we do
|
||||
[Lwt.both (change_and_push ..) (change_and_push ..)], they can not run
|
||||
concurrently! The second will waiting the first to finish.
|
||||
(reynir): Furthermore, we need to create a new task and update
|
||||
[change_and_push_waiter] before we wait on the existing
|
||||
[change_and_push_waiter] task without any yield point in between to
|
||||
ensure serializability. *)
|
||||
let open Lwt.Syntax in
|
||||
let* () = Lwt_mutex.with_lock t.mutex @@ fun () ->
|
||||
let rec await () =
|
||||
if t.change_and_push_running
|
||||
then Lwt_condition.wait ~mutex:t.mutex t.condition >>= await
|
||||
else begin t.change_and_push_running <- true; Lwt.return_unit end in
|
||||
await () in
|
||||
( let open Lwt_result.Infix in
|
||||
tree_root_hash_of_store t >>= fun tree_root_hash ->
|
||||
let t' = { t with committed = Some tree_root_hash } in
|
||||
f t' >>! fun res ->
|
||||
(* XXX(dinosaure): we assume that only [change_and_push] can reset [t.committed] to [None] and
|
||||
we ensured that [change_and_push] can not be called into [f]. So we are sure that [t'.committed]
|
||||
must be [Some _] in anyway. *)
|
||||
let[@warning "-8"] Some new_tree_root_hash = t'.committed in
|
||||
if Digestif.SHA1.equal new_tree_root_hash tree_root_hash
|
||||
then Lwt.return_ok res (* XXX(dinosaure): nothing to send! *)
|
||||
else if not (Option.equal Digestif.SHA1.equal t.head t'.head) then
|
||||
Lwt.return (Error (`Msg "store was modified outside of change_and_push, please retry"))
|
||||
else
|
||||
let action = Option.fold ~none:(`Create t.branch) ~some:(fun _ -> `Update (t.branch, t.branch)) t.head in
|
||||
let parents = Option.to_list t.head in
|
||||
let author = author ?name ?email now in
|
||||
let committer = author in
|
||||
let commit = Store.Value.Commit.make ~tree:new_tree_root_hash ~author ~committer
|
||||
~parents (Some message) in
|
||||
Store.write t.store (Git.Value.Commit commit) >>= fun (hash, _) ->
|
||||
Store.Ref.write t.store t.branch (Git.Reference.uid hash) >>= fun () ->
|
||||
Lwt.Infix.(Sync.push ~capabilities ~ctx:t.ctx t.edn t.store [ action ]
|
||||
>|= Result.map_error (fun err ->
|
||||
`Msg (Fmt.str "error pushing branch %a: %a"
|
||||
Git.Reference.pp t.branch Sync.pp_error err))
|
||||
>>? fun () ->
|
||||
Store.shallow t.store hash >|= Result.ok) >>= fun () ->
|
||||
t.head <- Some hash ;
|
||||
Lwt.return_ok res )
|
||||
>|= Result.map_error
|
||||
(fun err -> `Msg (Fmt.str "error pushing %a" Store.pp_error err))
|
||||
>>= fun res ->
|
||||
let* () = Lwt_mutex.with_lock t.mutex @@ fun () ->
|
||||
t.change_and_push_running <- false;
|
||||
Lwt_condition.signal t.condition ();
|
||||
Lwt.return_unit in
|
||||
Lwt.return res
|
||||
Lwt_mutex.with_lock t.mutex (fun () ->
|
||||
(let open Lwt_result.Infix in
|
||||
tree_root_hash_of_store t >>= fun tree_root_hash ->
|
||||
let t' = { t with committed = Some tree_root_hash } in
|
||||
f t' >>! fun res ->
|
||||
(* XXX(dinosaure): we assume that only [change_and_push] can reset [t.committed] to [None] and
|
||||
we ensured that [change_and_push] can not be called into [f]. So we are sure that [t'.committed]
|
||||
must be [Some _] in anyway. *)
|
||||
let[@warning "-8"] Some new_tree_root_hash = t'.committed in
|
||||
hannes
commented
the reason for this change is: we may have one change_and_push that is active, and when there are then multiple other change_and_push that should be executed, each needs to wait for the next one. previously, the code had all other change_and_push wait for the same task -- and thus there may have been multiple waiting change_and_push waken up at the same time, leading to races. the reason for this change is: we may have one change_and_push that is active, and when there are then multiple other change_and_push that should be executed, each needs to wait for the next one.
previously, the code had all other change_and_push wait for the same task -- and thus there may have been multiple waiting change_and_push waken up at the same time, leading to races.
|
||||
if Digestif.SHA1.equal new_tree_root_hash tree_root_hash
|
||||
then Lwt.return_ok res (* XXX(dinosaure): nothing to send! *)
|
||||
else if not (Option.equal Digestif.SHA1.equal t.head t'.head) then
|
||||
hannes marked this conversation as resolved
Outdated
dinosaure
commented
`t.change_and_push` is already set 3 lines before.
hannes
commented
indeed, removed in indeed, removed in 750ec11
|
||||
Lwt.return (Error (`Msg "store was modified outside of change_and_push, please retry"))
|
||||
else
|
||||
let action = Option.fold ~none:(`Create t.branch) ~some:(fun _ -> `Update (t.branch, t.branch)) t.head in
|
||||
let parents = Option.to_list t.head in
|
||||
let author = author ?name ?email now in
|
||||
let committer = author in
|
||||
let commit = Store.Value.Commit.make ~tree:new_tree_root_hash ~author ~committer
|
||||
~parents (Some message) in
|
||||
Store.write t.store (Git.Value.Commit commit) >>= fun (hash, _) ->
|
||||
hannes
commented
this change requires that the head didn't mutate since we started the change_and_push. we could as well do a rebase or merge, but we weren't able to find merge/rebase code. this is illustrated by the test this change requires that the head didn't mutate since we started the change_and_push. we could as well do a rebase or merge, but we weren't able to find merge/rebase code.
this is illustrated by the test `set_outside_change_and_push`.
|
||||
Store.Ref.write t.store t.branch (Git.Reference.uid hash) >>= fun () ->
|
||||
Lwt.Infix.(Sync.push ~capabilities ~ctx:t.ctx t.edn t.store [ action ]
|
||||
>|= Result.map_error (fun err ->
|
||||
`Msg (Fmt.str "error pushing branch %a: %a"
|
||||
Git.Reference.pp t.branch Sync.pp_error err))
|
||||
>>? fun () ->
|
||||
Store.shallow t.store hash >|= Result.ok) >>= fun () ->
|
||||
t.head <- Some hash ;
|
||||
Lwt.return_ok res)
|
||||
>|= Result.map_error
|
||||
(fun err -> `Msg (Fmt.str "error pushing %a" Store.pp_error err)))
|
||||
end
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
Could this be done with the mutex only instead of a bool, mutex and a condition?
Indeed, we can acquire the mutex at the begin of change_and_push -- which will wait (block) until the mutex is unused.
yes, basically protect the whole
change_and_push
with a mutex will solve all of our issues 😄