diff --git a/Projects/Pinata b/Projects/Pinata
index 340c7db..7535224 100644
--- a/Projects/Pinata
+++ b/Projects/Pinata
@@ -12,9 +12,11 @@ client and a TLS server listening on a port.  The total size, including TLS,
 X.509, TCP/IP, of the virtual machine image is 4MB, which is less than 4% of a
 comparable system using a Linux kernel and OpenSSL.
 
-When a TLS handshake is successfully completed with mutual authentication, the
-Piñata transmits the private key to a bitcoin wallet which initially contained
-10BTC.  In 2018, most of them will be reused for other projects.
+When a TLS handshake with the Piñata is successful including mutual
+authentication, the Piñata transmits the private key to a Bitcoin wallet which
+initially contained 10BTC.  The project started on February 10th 2015.  Our
+lender transferred on March 18th 2018 the 10BTC and repurposed them for other
+projects.
 
 On startup, the Piñata generates its certificate authority on the fly, including
 certificates and private keys.  This means that only the Piñata itself contains
@@ -22,13 +24,11 @@ private keys which can authenticate successfully, and an attacker has to find
 an exploitable flaw in any software layer (OCaml runtime, virtual network
 device, TCP/IP stack, TLS library, X.509 validation, or elsewhere) to complete the challenge.
 
-The Piñata is online since February 2015, and even though thousands of unique IP
-addresses established connections and initiated TLS handshakes, no bitcoins were
-taken.  Looks like its security is decent or obscure enough.
+The Piñata is online since February 10th 2015, and even though hundreds of
+thousands of connections and initiated TLS handshakes, no Bitcoins were taken.
 
 By using a Bitcoin wallet, the Piñata is a transparent bug bounty.  Everybody
-can observe (by looking into the Bitcoin blockchain) whether it has been
-compromised and the money has been transferred to another wallet.  It is also
-self-serving: when an attacker discovers a flaw, they don't need to fill out
-any forms to retrieve the bounty, instead they can take the wallet, without any
-questions asked.
+can observe (by looking into the blockchain) whether it has been compromised and
+the money has been transferred to another wallet.  It is also self-serving: when
+an attacker discovers a flaw, they don't need to fill out any forms to retrieve
+the bounty, instead they can take the wallet, without any questions asked.